<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Agitator &#187; democratic party fundraising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.net/tag/democratic-party-fundraising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.net</link>
	<description>Fundraising and advocacy strategies. Trends, tips ... with an edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:50:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen Colbert, CFRE</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/research/stephen-colbert-cfre/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=stephen-colbert-cfre</link>
		<comments>http://www.theagitator.net/research/stephen-colbert-cfre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 05:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rcraver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[celebrities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebrities and fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic party fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen colbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the 'colbert bump']]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/research/stephen-colbert-cfre/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rejoice! The world of Fundraising Esoteria is now much richer and I just couldn&#8217;t wait to share the joy! The most recent issue of PS: Political Science and Politics, a journal of the American Political Science Association carries great news for Democratic fundraisers and candidates: Democratic politicians receive a 40% increase in contributions in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Rejoice!<span>  </span>The world of Fundraising Esoteria is now much richer and I just couldn&rsquo;t wait to share the joy!</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The most recent issue of <span style="font-style: normal;"><a title="The Colbert Bump" href="http://www.apsanet.org/imgtest/PSJuly08Fowler.pdf">PS:<span>  </span>Political Science and Politics</a>, a journal of the American Political Science Association carries great news for Democratic fundraisers and candidates:<span>  </span><strong>Democratic politicians receive a 40% increase in contributions in the 30 day period following their appearances on the comedy cable show The Colbert Report.</strong></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The analysis was done by political scientist James H. Fowler of the University of California at San Diego and an<span>  </span>avowed Colbert fan.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">What&rsquo;s the &ldquo;Colbert Bump&rdquo; worth? Democrats who come on the program raise $8,247 more than their same-party colleagues who don&rsquo;t &ndash; a bump of 40% over the normal rate of receipts according to Prof. Fowler.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">And, probably in the interest of bi-partisanship, the good professor notes that Republicans don&rsquo;t appear to benefit at all by appearing on <em>The Colbert Report</em><span style="font-style: normal;">.<span>  </span>In fact, they raise more money in the month before coming on the program and less money in the month following their appearance &ndash; a possible &ldquo;Colbert Bust.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Mercifully, Fowler notes it is &ldquo;important not to read too much into these results&rdquo; (really?), but does conclude that due to the &ldquo;elite demographic of the program&rsquo;s<span>  </span>audience&quot; (about 1.2 million viewers) <em>The Colbert Report </em><span style="font-style: normal;">appears to exercise &quot;disproportionate real world influence.&rdquo;</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Does this &ldquo;disproportionate real world influence&rdquo; translate into election victories also?<span>  </span>We&rsquo;ll have to wait for the outcome of the 2008 races to see.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">My breath is bated.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Roger<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p><!--EndFragment--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theagitator.net/research/stephen-colbert-cfre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

