http://www.theagitator.net/research/roger-and-tom-discuss-chicken-little/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=roger-and-tom-discuss-chicken-little Fundraising and advocacy strategies. Trends, tips ... with an edge Thu, 24 May 2012 10:56:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.theagitator.net/research/roger-and-tom-discuss-chicken-little/comment-page-1/#comment-1983 Annette Kelley Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:06:04 +0000 http://www.theagitator.net/research/roger-and-tom-discuss-chicken-little/#comment-1983 I liked it. Do it again soon. Very helpful as I am about to start a new short term contract with an organisation that will be struggling with these very issues. Thanks chaps! I liked it. Do it again soon. Very helpful as I am about to start a new short term contract with an organisation that will be struggling with these very issues. Thanks chaps!

]]> http://www.theagitator.net/research/roger-and-tom-discuss-chicken-little/comment-page-1/#comment-1982 kevin shipley Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:32:29 +0000 http://www.theagitator.net/research/roger-and-tom-discuss-chicken-little/#comment-1982 hey guys, i really enjoyed the audio (chicken little). i am in fundraising, mostly middle donors acquisition and retention. back and forth dialogue is always useful when each person comes from a different perspective. On a techical poit, Rogers audio was much softer than Tom's. Once those audio features are balanced it would be perfect. Thumbs up on the broadcast idea. kevin hey guys, i really enjoyed the audio (chicken little). i am in fundraising, mostly middle donors acquisition and retention. back and forth dialogue is always useful when each person comes from a different perspective. On a techical poit, Rogers audio was much softer than Tom’s. Once those audio features are balanced it would be perfect.
Thumbs up on the broadcast idea.
kevin

]]>