<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Typography For Donors?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.net/research/new-typography-for-donors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.net/research/new-typography-for-donors/</link>
	<description>Fundraising and advocacy strategies. Trends, tips ... with an edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:53:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Washington-Sare</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/research/new-typography-for-donors/comment-page-1/#comment-11799</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Washington-Sare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1294#comment-11799</guid>
		<description>There I was hoping for a discussion of the typographic merits of serifed or sans serifed type

Instead I get an article on donor typology

Hurrumph!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There I was hoping for a discussion of the typographic merits of serifed or sans serifed type</p>
<p>Instead I get an article on donor typology</p>
<p>Hurrumph!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
