<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watch AARP online!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.net/media-usage/watch-aarp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.net/media-usage/watch-aarp/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=watch-aarp</link>
	<description>Fundraising and advocacy strategies. Trends, tips ... with an edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:56:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gretchen Arntz</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/media-usage/watch-aarp/comment-page-1/#comment-26891</link>
		<dc:creator>Gretchen Arntz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 14:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1467#comment-26891</guid>
		<description>In response to Penelope Blackwell - It is a little bit curious that AARP sets 50 years old as its lower age limit for membership. It&#039;s probably because of the collective buying power of those of us who are in the 50 - 65 year old pre-retirement age! Their advertisers want access to us. Also, it&#039;s a way of building their base for future stability. Personally I like AARP and think that the organization has a lot to offer, including interesting research like this. I also agree that our age bracket (50+) does prefer to read printed materials!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Penelope Blackwell &#8211; It is a little bit curious that AARP sets 50 years old as its lower age limit for membership. It&#8217;s probably because of the collective buying power of those of us who are in the 50 &#8211; 65 year old pre-retirement age! Their advertisers want access to us. Also, it&#8217;s a way of building their base for future stability. Personally I like AARP and think that the organization has a lot to offer, including interesting research like this. I also agree that our age bracket (50+) does prefer to read printed materials!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penelope Blackwell</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/media-usage/watch-aarp/comment-page-1/#comment-26887</link>
		<dc:creator>Penelope Blackwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1467#comment-26887</guid>
		<description>Hi,
What is it with 50 plus?  Why is there surprise that we&#039;re IT literate.  I&#039;m 53.  I did a 3-year part time MBA at Edinburgh University, starting one month before my 50th birthday.  I&#039;m going to be working at least until I&#039;m 65, and probably longer as the UK retirement age keeps going up.
Why am I in the same age bracket as people in their 60s, 70s, 80&#039;s and 90&#039;s.  If my grandmother were still alive, she&#039;d be in the same group (at 96).  That&#039;s a lot of different generations, a lot of different learning experiences, and too big a demographic to make any useful generalisations from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
What is it with 50 plus?  Why is there surprise that we&#8217;re IT literate.  I&#8217;m 53.  I did a 3-year part time MBA at Edinburgh University, starting one month before my 50th birthday.  I&#8217;m going to be working at least until I&#8217;m 65, and probably longer as the UK retirement age keeps going up.<br />
Why am I in the same age bracket as people in their 60s, 70s, 80&#8242;s and 90&#8242;s.  If my grandmother were still alive, she&#8217;d be in the same group (at 96).  That&#8217;s a lot of different generations, a lot of different learning experiences, and too big a demographic to make any useful generalisations from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

