<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Donations: Usability Testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.net/hot-research/online-donations-usability-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.net/hot-research/online-donations-usability-testing/</link>
	<description>Fundraising and advocacy strategies. Trends, tips ... with an edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:21:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: More on the Nielson report &#171; happydonors</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/hot-research/online-donations-usability-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-6539</link>
		<dc:creator>More on the Nielson report &#171; happydonors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1170#comment-6539</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8212; the best advice/commentary blog for nonprofits out there &#8212; recently commented on the Nielson Norman report I just cited.  Blackbaud&#8217;s Steve McLauglin posted some comments on this including [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8212; the best advice/commentary blog for nonprofits out there &#8212; recently commented on the Nielson Norman report I just cited.  Blackbaud&#8217;s Steve McLauglin posted some comments on this including [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/hot-research/online-donations-usability-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-6507</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1170#comment-6507</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great link to the report.  It&#039;s worth noting that A/B testing is always critical for usability.  Slight changes in locations of buttons, color schemes, or work flows can lead to significantly different results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great link to the report.  It&#8217;s worth noting that A/B testing is always critical for usability.  Slight changes in locations of buttons, color schemes, or work flows can lead to significantly different results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Shaw</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/hot-research/online-donations-usability-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-6483</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Shaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1170#comment-6483</guid>
		<description>I had a slightly different take on the same source site, for what it may be worth: http://happydonors.com/?p=293</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a slightly different take on the same source site, for what it may be worth: <a href="http://happydonors.com/?p=293" rel="nofollow">http://happydonors.com/?p=293</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve MacLaughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/hot-research/online-donations-usability-testing/comment-page-1/#comment-6431</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve MacLaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1170#comment-6431</guid>
		<description>Usability testing is one of the more under utilized things you can do to improve your online results. It doesn&#039;t require a lot of resources or costs to do even basic testing. I highly recommend Steve Krug&#039;s book &quot;Don&#039;t Make Me Think&quot; which is written for a non-technical audience.

The Nielsen report covers a lot more than just online donations. It really give a good breakdown of some nonprofit website design best practices. 

Some good nuggets in the report include:
- Fixing a process with even minor usability problems might increase donations by 10%.
-The most frequently mentioned turnoffs was a lack of or unclear description of an organization’s mission, goals, objectives, or work.
- Confirmation pages are critical on both e-commerce and donation sites. However, non-profit and charity sites must include a confirmation page as part of the donation process, which should include a receipt for tax purposes. Additionally, a receipt should be emailed to the address provided during the donation process.
- Some charities, especially those that support medical research, treatment, and support, should allow users to specify an individual to make their donation in honor or memory of.
- On the confirmation page, thank users for their donation. It doesn’t need to be elaborate, but a simple recognition is appreciated. Also, it’s nice to reiterate how the money will be used.

The report should pay for itself if you try just a few of the recommendations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usability testing is one of the more under utilized things you can do to improve your online results. It doesn&#8217;t require a lot of resources or costs to do even basic testing. I highly recommend Steve Krug&#8217;s book &#8220;Don&#8217;t Make Me Think&#8221; which is written for a non-technical audience.</p>
<p>The Nielsen report covers a lot more than just online donations. It really give a good breakdown of some nonprofit website design best practices. </p>
<p>Some good nuggets in the report include:<br />
- Fixing a process with even minor usability problems might increase donations by 10%.<br />
-The most frequently mentioned turnoffs was a lack of or unclear description of an organization’s mission, goals, objectives, or work.<br />
- Confirmation pages are critical on both e-commerce and donation sites. However, non-profit and charity sites must include a confirmation page as part of the donation process, which should include a receipt for tax purposes. Additionally, a receipt should be emailed to the address provided during the donation process.<br />
- Some charities, especially those that support medical research, treatment, and support, should allow users to specify an individual to make their donation in honor or memory of.<br />
- On the confirmation page, thank users for their donation. It doesn’t need to be elaborate, but a simple recognition is appreciated. Also, it’s nice to reiterate how the money will be used.</p>
<p>The report should pay for itself if you try just a few of the recommendations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
