<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Generational Giving Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.net/hot-research/new-generational-giving-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.net/hot-research/new-generational-giving-data/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-generational-giving-data</link>
	<description>Fundraising and advocacy strategies. Trends, tips ... with an edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:56:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cherita Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/hot-research/new-generational-giving-data/comment-page-1/#comment-24259</link>
		<dc:creator>Cherita Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 19:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1388#comment-24259</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t find the stats on younger donors and mail all that surprising, if you keep in mind a couple things: 

a) many organizations still don&#039;t have great online giving programs in place, and I&#039;ve found a lot of smaller organizations where the only way to give is offline. 

b) younger people aren&#039;t likely to be on lots of mailing lists just yet, so they haven&#039;t had the chance to get burned out on direct mail. In fact, I&#039;d say there&#039;s probably a segment of younger people who find getting mail almost exciting, just because it&#039;s something of a novelty - I know I used to feel like that! Although, I&#039;d be willing to bet their threshold for being over-solicited is much lower, and if that happens the numbers will decrease at a much faster rate than it did for Boomers. I think that&#039;d be an interesting trend to keep an eye on over the next few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t find the stats on younger donors and mail all that surprising, if you keep in mind a couple things: </p>
<p>a) many organizations still don&#8217;t have great online giving programs in place, and I&#8217;ve found a lot of smaller organizations where the only way to give is offline. </p>
<p>b) younger people aren&#8217;t likely to be on lots of mailing lists just yet, so they haven&#8217;t had the chance to get burned out on direct mail. In fact, I&#8217;d say there&#8217;s probably a segment of younger people who find getting mail almost exciting, just because it&#8217;s something of a novelty &#8211; I know I used to feel like that! Although, I&#8217;d be willing to bet their threshold for being over-solicited is much lower, and if that happens the numbers will decrease at a much faster rate than it did for Boomers. I think that&#8217;d be an interesting trend to keep an eye on over the next few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinay</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/hot-research/new-generational-giving-data/comment-page-1/#comment-23857</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 06:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1388#comment-23857</guid>
		<description>Tom - thanks for covering the research.  We believe there are several telling insights in it for charities.  Beyond the increasing necessity to operate multi-channel, we also believe the research indicates that younger donor groups can be economic and that a more concerted effort needs to occur to attract them to grow donor acquisition rates which have been a challenge for many charities stuck in the traditional marketing model.  I also believe another key insight was the imperative to develop more of a focus on peer to peer engagement vs. direct solicitation alone.

Vinay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom &#8211; thanks for covering the research.  We believe there are several telling insights in it for charities.  Beyond the increasing necessity to operate multi-channel, we also believe the research indicates that younger donor groups can be economic and that a more concerted effort needs to occur to attract them to grow donor acquisition rates which have been a challenge for many charities stuck in the traditional marketing model.  I also believe another key insight was the imperative to develop more of a focus on peer to peer engagement vs. direct solicitation alone.</p>
<p>Vinay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

