<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time&#8217;s Up!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.net/fundraising/times-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.net/fundraising/times-up/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=times-up</link>
	<description>Fundraising and advocacy strategies. Trends, tips ... with an edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 10:56:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Lauber</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/fundraising/times-up/comment-page-1/#comment-5534</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Lauber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1081#comment-5534</guid>
		<description>Tom,
What you (and Seth) say about decision-making is mostly true.  Like deciding whether to marry the man/woman you’ve been dating for two years.  You are not going to make a better decision by investing another year in the decision-making process.  However, a lot more decisions have a significant left-brained, almost aesthetic, component.  Like whether to buy that sport coat or whether to include a photo of a client in the solicitation package.  These decisions need to sift awhile as they make their way to the consciously-felt level.  You know when you leave a movie if you liked it or not, but you don’t know till the next morning, or even the day after that, if it affected you at a deeper level.  So, I would say that decision-making is a little more complicated than this piece indicates, as most decisions need to factor in the lag time that I have described above.
Curt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,<br />
What you (and Seth) say about decision-making is mostly true.  Like deciding whether to marry the man/woman you’ve been dating for two years.  You are not going to make a better decision by investing another year in the decision-making process.  However, a lot more decisions have a significant left-brained, almost aesthetic, component.  Like whether to buy that sport coat or whether to include a photo of a client in the solicitation package.  These decisions need to sift awhile as they make their way to the consciously-felt level.  You know when you leave a movie if you liked it or not, but you don’t know till the next morning, or even the day after that, if it affected you at a deeper level.  So, I would say that decision-making is a little more complicated than this piece indicates, as most decisions need to factor in the lag time that I have described above.<br />
Curt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

