In my own education, “rearing,” apprenticeship and many years of practice in nonprofit organizational advancement, I keep in mind that I was raised and mentored to see fund raising as the “cart behind the horse” — the final phase of a process or continuum that begins with building constituencies, continues through cultivation and management of relationships (with those constituencies), and culminates with the formation of a loyal donor who invests in the mission way beyond the first year.

If one agrees that this is really how it all properly works, then one also assumes that this process or continuum absolutely demands the habit of regular and sustained initiatives in donor (i.e., “consumer”)-behavior research. In other words, it’s critical to routinely survey one’s donors to gain intelligence about their perspectives on the organization and their attitudes and concerns about what is done with their investments.

Without such research, whether through surveys or other similar methodologies, there is no way to know how to measure the organization’s societal impact as well as the effectiveness of its advancement/philanthropy program, including but certainly not limited to direct-response fund-raising initiatives.

I can’t say that I would suggest a better candidate for the winner of the fund-raising World Cup. I might view it more broadly and call it something else, relating it to overall strength and quality of constituent relationship as well as financial contributions.

In the end, it’s all cut from the same piece of fabric! Great posting, gentlemen!