A very short post from Seth Godin, called There’s nothing wrong with a plan.

Godin says:

Plans are great.

But missions are better. Missions survive when plans fail, and plans almost always fail.

The Agitator says:

Nonsense. Boy, does he annoy me sometimes!

Missions are a dime a dozen. Saving children from poverty is a noble mission. Thousands of nonprofits and NGOs work on this mission. Some of them have far superior plans than others. Those are the ones who deserve donor support.

From a donor’s perspective, the mission is a given. The differentiator is the plan or strategy for effecting change.

So I say missions are great. But effective plans are better.

And that’s why today’s donors — meaning the Boomers following all those duty-driven 65 years+ donors — are harder to please. They require more proof of effectiveness … results.

Perhaps you can still fundraise from a 65+ donor on the inherent strength of your mission … and maybe from a starry-eyed teenager via their social site page. But, I submit, that won’t work with most donors in between … and especially those adventuresome Boomers we’ve been talking about the past two days. They want to assess how you expect pull it off. They’ll accept some risk in your plan … but they want a plan.

What do you say … mission or plan?

Tom

P.S. Innovation and risk-taking is fine. They must be part of your game. That said, how many fundraising ‘plans’ of yours might go down the toilet before your boss or client ‘invited’ you to find a new mission?!

This article was posted in: accountability, Boomers, Don't Miss these Posts, fundraising, nonprofit management, nonprofits, Seth Godin.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.