<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fundraising Vital Signs 1 &#8211; Responses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.net/dont-miss-these-posts/fundraising-vital-signs-1-responses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.net/dont-miss-these-posts/fundraising-vital-signs-1-responses/</link>
	<description>Fundraising and advocacy strategies. Trends, tips ... with an edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:58:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil Gallaiford</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/dont-miss-these-posts/fundraising-vital-signs-1-responses/comment-page-1/#comment-2377</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Gallaiford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/dont-miss-these-posts/fundraising-vital-signs-1-responses/#comment-2377</guid>
		<description>Am I missing something?  Your survey reports that [only] 51% of the respondents expect their gift revenue to be down (a little or a lot).  Given the breathless predictions of impending doom, wouldn&#039;t one expect more?

Don&#039;t the results mean that very nearly half expect revenue to be the same or higher?  

And for some types of charities, two-thirds to three-quarters are expecting no change or improvements in revenue (animal welfare and faith-based).

Is the glass half full or half empty?  The way you are expressing the results of the survey seems to be playing into a Chicken Little, sky is falling, reaction.  

As was expressed by senior fundraisers gathered in Holland two weeks ago for the International Fundraising Congress, &#039;the greatest thing we have to fear is fear itself.&#039;  History tells us that charities that *invest* in fundraising during economic downturns are usually rewarded with growth in donors, revenue and marketshare.

I note that 100% of your humanitarian assistance respondents expect a downturn.  In Holland, the reps from the big international NGOs were all counselling increased investments in fundraising to reap the rewards mentioned above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I missing something?  Your survey reports that [only] 51% of the respondents expect their gift revenue to be down (a little or a lot).  Given the breathless predictions of impending doom, wouldn&#8217;t one expect more?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t the results mean that very nearly half expect revenue to be the same or higher?  </p>
<p>And for some types of charities, two-thirds to three-quarters are expecting no change or improvements in revenue (animal welfare and faith-based).</p>
<p>Is the glass half full or half empty?  The way you are expressing the results of the survey seems to be playing into a Chicken Little, sky is falling, reaction.  </p>
<p>As was expressed by senior fundraisers gathered in Holland two weeks ago for the International Fundraising Congress, &#8216;the greatest thing we have to fear is fear itself.&#8217;  History tells us that charities that *invest* in fundraising during economic downturns are usually rewarded with growth in donors, revenue and marketshare.</p>
<p>I note that 100% of your humanitarian assistance respondents expect a downturn.  In Holland, the reps from the big international NGOs were all counselling increased investments in fundraising to reap the rewards mentioned above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happydonors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fundraising in a Tough Economy #2 &#8212; Some stats</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/dont-miss-these-posts/fundraising-vital-signs-1-responses/comment-page-1/#comment-2352</link>
		<dc:creator>happydonors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fundraising in a Tough Economy #2 &#8212; Some stats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/dont-miss-these-posts/fundraising-vital-signs-1-responses/#comment-2352</guid>
		<description>[...] asked readers about their expectations for the remainder of 2008 and just published some results in Fundraising Vital Signs 1.    A few [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] asked readers about their expectations for the remainder of 2008 and just published some results in Fundraising Vital Signs 1.    A few [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dolores McDonagh</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/dont-miss-these-posts/fundraising-vital-signs-1-responses/comment-page-1/#comment-2339</link>
		<dc:creator>Dolores McDonagh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 13:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/dont-miss-these-posts/fundraising-vital-signs-1-responses/#comment-2339</guid>
		<description>A word of caution on the &quot;address the economy head on&quot; approach.  

A couple of weeks ago we tested an email acquisition &amp; reactivation ask to our non-member and lapsed member email prospects.  We used a variation of our current offline acquisition message WITH a challenge grant -- &quot;join and your dues will be matched dollar for dollar.&quot;

We tested adding one sentence that mentions the current economic environment and why we need their support even more.  The result?  A 25% drop in response rate and average gift.  Not the most scientific of tests (our e-file isn&#039;t huge, but it was still a compelling drop).  But siginificant enough for me to rethink the whole messaging conundrum.

Anyone who&#039;d like to see the two versions is welcome to shoot me an email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A word of caution on the &#8220;address the economy head on&#8221; approach.  </p>
<p>A couple of weeks ago we tested an email acquisition &amp; reactivation ask to our non-member and lapsed member email prospects.  We used a variation of our current offline acquisition message WITH a challenge grant &#8212; &#8220;join and your dues will be matched dollar for dollar.&#8221;</p>
<p>We tested adding one sentence that mentions the current economic environment and why we need their support even more.  The result?  A 25% drop in response rate and average gift.  Not the most scientific of tests (our e-file isn&#8217;t huge, but it was still a compelling drop).  But siginificant enough for me to rethink the whole messaging conundrum.</p>
<p>Anyone who&#8217;d like to see the two versions is welcome to shoot me an email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/dont-miss-these-posts/fundraising-vital-signs-1-responses/comment-page-1/#comment-2319</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/dont-miss-these-posts/fundraising-vital-signs-1-responses/#comment-2319</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this overview! A very welcome and informative post on how our colleagues view the impact of the financial crisis!

One comment though, with respect your remark on &#039;one can only wonder if the advisers haven’t yet shared the bad news, or if nonprofit clients aren’t absorbing it&#039;. 

I have to say, I don&#039;t agree on this one completely.. It seems to assume advisers know the trend better than their clients. Of course, they have the opportunity to see things in a wider perspective, the overview of the trends with multiple clients..
However, as a client, I do believe I know my own donor base better than any adviser could. And, to be really sceptic, that there is &#039;business&#039; for advisers to predict the worst case scenario, isn&#039;t there?

But of course, all of us should constantly keep track on the impact of the crisis, and adapt our plans/forecasts accordingly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this overview! A very welcome and informative post on how our colleagues view the impact of the financial crisis!</p>
<p>One comment though, with respect your remark on &#8216;one can only wonder if the advisers haven’t yet shared the bad news, or if nonprofit clients aren’t absorbing it&#8217;. </p>
<p>I have to say, I don&#8217;t agree on this one completely.. It seems to assume advisers know the trend better than their clients. Of course, they have the opportunity to see things in a wider perspective, the overview of the trends with multiple clients..<br />
However, as a client, I do believe I know my own donor base better than any adviser could. And, to be really sceptic, that there is &#8216;business&#8217; for advisers to predict the worst case scenario, isn&#8217;t there?</p>
<p>But of course, all of us should constantly keep track on the impact of the crisis, and adapt our plans/forecasts accordingly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
