<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Donor Pyramid Lie &#8211; II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.net/communications/the-donor-pyramid-lie-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/the-donor-pyramid-lie-ii/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-donor-pyramid-lie-ii</link>
	<description>Fundraising and advocacy strategies. Trends, tips ... with an edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:58:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/the-donor-pyramid-lie-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-29128</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1335#comment-29128</guid>
		<description>If I were to follow the traditional donor pyramid (the only kind I&#039;ve known until reading this conversation), I would be put off asking my regular givers to give a one-off donation. So am I right in thinking I can ask now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were to follow the traditional donor pyramid (the only kind I&#8217;ve known until reading this conversation), I would be put off asking my regular givers to give a one-off donation. So am I right in thinking I can ask now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Sargent</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/the-donor-pyramid-lie-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-19364</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Sargent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1335#comment-19364</guid>
		<description>Katie,
Mal Warwick wrote about who gives bequests in an excellent article on the website SOFII, called &quot;Just the Facts on Legacy Giving.&quot; It&#039;s free. Well worth a read.
All best, 
Lisa Sargent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katie,<br />
Mal Warwick wrote about who gives bequests in an excellent article on the website SOFII, called &#8220;Just the Facts on Legacy Giving.&#8221; It&#8217;s free. Well worth a read.<br />
All best,<br />
Lisa Sargent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/the-donor-pyramid-lie-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-19046</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1335#comment-19046</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing the way, Nancy &amp; Virginia, I appreciate the cites - it is hard to know how to google-search for that kind of info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing the way, Nancy &amp; Virginia, I appreciate the cites &#8211; it is hard to know how to google-search for that kind of info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virginia Ikkanda-Suddith</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/the-donor-pyramid-lie-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-19027</link>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Ikkanda-Suddith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1335#comment-19027</guid>
		<description>This has been an interesting discussion.  I have used the pyramid in training and presentations as a way to visualize numbers of donors and staffing issues with institutional leaders.  

Rather than comparing it to a ladder, I&#039;ve emphasized that a donor could entered at any level although a goodly portion come through the large base of the pyramid.  I&#039;ve also emphasized that one of a Development Officer&#039;s goals is to guide donors at one level to be donors at all levels--annual giving and major gifts and planned giving.  Some will continue to give at one level; others at two; and the ultimate donor at all three.  In presenting this concept, the pyramid is not as useful a tool.

To Katie:  Yes, look at research in loyalty.  You might find something at Robert Sharpe&#039;s website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been an interesting discussion.  I have used the pyramid in training and presentations as a way to visualize numbers of donors and staffing issues with institutional leaders.  </p>
<p>Rather than comparing it to a ladder, I&#8217;ve emphasized that a donor could entered at any level although a goodly portion come through the large base of the pyramid.  I&#8217;ve also emphasized that one of a Development Officer&#8217;s goals is to guide donors at one level to be donors at all levels&#8211;annual giving and major gifts and planned giving.  Some will continue to give at one level; others at two; and the ultimate donor at all three.  In presenting this concept, the pyramid is not as useful a tool.</p>
<p>To Katie:  Yes, look at research in loyalty.  You might find something at Robert Sharpe&#8217;s website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Withbroe</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/the-donor-pyramid-lie-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-19024</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Withbroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1335#comment-19024</guid>
		<description>Katie - check out the book &quot;Iceberg Philanthropy: Unlocking Extraordinary Gifts from Ordinary Donors&quot; by Green, McDonald and van Herpt, published in 2007. Lots of good research about how bequest donors are typically DM donors, generally NOT wealthy, with a history of giving many small gifts over many years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katie &#8211; check out the book &#8220;Iceberg Philanthropy: Unlocking Extraordinary Gifts from Ordinary Donors&#8221; by Green, McDonald and van Herpt, published in 2007. Lots of good research about how bequest donors are typically DM donors, generally NOT wealthy, with a history of giving many small gifts over many years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/the-donor-pyramid-lie-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-18911</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1335#comment-18911</guid>
		<description>Is there any research supporting the link between long-time givers and bequests?  I have been pushing for a club for long-time givers and this would be a helpful piece to have in hand.  Thank you for this interesting conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any research supporting the link between long-time givers and bequests?  I have been pushing for a club for long-time givers and this would be a helpful piece to have in hand.  Thank you for this interesting conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristin McCurry</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/the-donor-pyramid-lie-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-18906</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristin McCurry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1335#comment-18906</guid>
		<description>Bravo John, Tony, Lisa, et al!  The donor pyramid hasn&#039;t been a pyramid for a long time - if it ever was.  In the best of cases it is a trapezoid - and only then if communications and contacts are well managed, staff work well together through the donor continuum, and all teams are held accountable for results.  
At this week&#039;s DMA Nonprofit Federation conference in Washington, I&#039;ll be sharing MINDset&#039;s view on managing these communications.  It dovetails well with Tony&#039;s, as included in Think&#039;s whitepaper.  Tom and Roger, I&#039;m sending to you under separate cover - feel free to share with the Agitator audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo John, Tony, Lisa, et al!  The donor pyramid hasn&#8217;t been a pyramid for a long time &#8211; if it ever was.  In the best of cases it is a trapezoid &#8211; and only then if communications and contacts are well managed, staff work well together through the donor continuum, and all teams are held accountable for results.<br />
At this week&#8217;s DMA Nonprofit Federation conference in Washington, I&#8217;ll be sharing MINDset&#8217;s view on managing these communications.  It dovetails well with Tony&#8217;s, as included in Think&#8217;s whitepaper.  Tom and Roger, I&#8217;m sending to you under separate cover &#8211; feel free to share with the Agitator audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sauvé-Rodd</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/the-donor-pyramid-lie-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-18880</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sauvé-Rodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 09:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1335#comment-18880</guid>
		<description>On the &#039;seven years to a £1000 gift&#039; assertion, a way to prove/disprove 7 (or any other number of years before a serious gift is made) is * calculate years of giving - easy - from the start year * select those with $1000 gifts * do a cross tab * apply Pearson&#039;s timeless Chi Square test and see if there is any significant connection. Simples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the &#8216;seven years to a £1000 gift&#8217; assertion, a way to prove/disprove 7 (or any other number of years before a serious gift is made) is * calculate years of giving &#8211; easy &#8211; from the start year * select those with $1000 gifts * do a cross tab * apply Pearson&#8217;s timeless Chi Square test and see if there is any significant connection. Simples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

