<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Donor Pyramid Lie &#8211; IV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.net/communications/the-donor-pyramid-iv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/the-donor-pyramid-iv/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-donor-pyramid-iv</link>
	<description>Fundraising and advocacy strategies. Trends, tips ... with an edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:58:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela Grow</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/the-donor-pyramid-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-19093</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela Grow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 12:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1337#comment-19093</guid>
		<description>So true.

Many of us land in nonprofit development with little to no training.  I came from a grant-making background when I landed my first development job and had the good fortune of having studied direct marketing.  My organization&#039;s first appeal was a resounding success right off the bat.  Sad to say that most of the nonprofit-specific coursework I&#039;ve taken since then has provided little by way of applicable techniques.

Two additions to the 25:  

1) Let them say it for you:  use clients&#039;, donors&#039;, staff members&#039;, etc. quotes liberally.
2)  Use P.S. - and even P.P.S. - to reiterate your point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So true.</p>
<p>Many of us land in nonprofit development with little to no training.  I came from a grant-making background when I landed my first development job and had the good fortune of having studied direct marketing.  My organization&#8217;s first appeal was a resounding success right off the bat.  Sad to say that most of the nonprofit-specific coursework I&#8217;ve taken since then has provided little by way of applicable techniques.</p>
<p>Two additions to the 25:  </p>
<p>1) Let them say it for you:  use clients&#8217;, donors&#8217;, staff members&#8217;, etc. quotes liberally.<br />
2)  Use P.S. &#8211; and even P.P.S. &#8211; to reiterate your point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill Ruchel</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/the-donor-pyramid-iv/comment-page-1/#comment-19085</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill Ruchel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1337#comment-19085</guid>
		<description>This is so true. One of the problems is that many charities do not understand how much science (and art) is in good copy, whether a slogan, letter copy, email or website. Some of this comes from a culture in smaller organisations of doing everything for nothing, and being a jack of all trades (whether by choice or not). Sometimes a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing. There is also, whether at board level or otherwise, a reluctance quite often to invest - not understanding that spending $5,000 on a copywriter for an appeal might turn a million dollar income into two million dollars. That kind of return is not always there, but I&#039;ve seen it more often than not when charities start to use skilled, understanding professionals for their copy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so true. One of the problems is that many charities do not understand how much science (and art) is in good copy, whether a slogan, letter copy, email or website. Some of this comes from a culture in smaller organisations of doing everything for nothing, and being a jack of all trades (whether by choice or not). Sometimes a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing. There is also, whether at board level or otherwise, a reluctance quite often to invest &#8211; not understanding that spending $5,000 on a copywriter for an appeal might turn a million dollar income into two million dollars. That kind of return is not always there, but I&#8217;ve seen it more often than not when charities start to use skilled, understanding professionals for their copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

