<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Telefundraising Works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.net/communications/telefundraising-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/telefundraising-works/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=telefundraising-works</link>
	<description>Fundraising and advocacy strategies. Trends, tips ... with an edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:21:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Cahalane</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/telefundraising-works/comment-page-1/#comment-27921</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Cahalane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1492#comment-27921</guid>
		<description>I have a love-hate relationship with telefunding.  On the one hand, I hate the calls - and I don&#039;t respond to them.  (Boo me, I know).  On the other, I&#039;ve seen them work when done correctly.  I&#039;ve seen well-trained callers - staff members who have first-hand information and experience with the mission - do a terrific job.  Often, donors would then wait for their call - they didn&#039;t want to miss the very pleasant chat they&#039;d had in the past!  Calls were never &quot;cold&quot; - people were from the organization&#039;s list only.  It worked very well.

I rarely receive calls like that.  More often, it&#039;s a caller obviously reading from a prepared script, whose training has seemingly consisted of nothing more than &quot;don&#039;t ever let the person off the phone!&quot;.  It&#039;s rude, and I will not ever respond to that.

Like everything else we do, do it right, do it respectfully, do it from a place of believing in the mission (not just in the paycheck) and it&#039;s likely to succeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a love-hate relationship with telefunding.  On the one hand, I hate the calls &#8211; and I don&#8217;t respond to them.  (Boo me, I know).  On the other, I&#8217;ve seen them work when done correctly.  I&#8217;ve seen well-trained callers &#8211; staff members who have first-hand information and experience with the mission &#8211; do a terrific job.  Often, donors would then wait for their call &#8211; they didn&#8217;t want to miss the very pleasant chat they&#8217;d had in the past!  Calls were never &#8220;cold&#8221; &#8211; people were from the organization&#8217;s list only.  It worked very well.</p>
<p>I rarely receive calls like that.  More often, it&#8217;s a caller obviously reading from a prepared script, whose training has seemingly consisted of nothing more than &#8220;don&#8217;t ever let the person off the phone!&#8221;.  It&#8217;s rude, and I will not ever respond to that.</p>
<p>Like everything else we do, do it right, do it respectfully, do it from a place of believing in the mission (not just in the paycheck) and it&#8217;s likely to succeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/telefundraising-works/comment-page-1/#comment-27918</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 13:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1492#comment-27918</guid>
		<description>Tom - 

While clearly a financially success, did Save the Children act responsibly in their innovative call-to-action campaign? In today&#039;s marketing intensive environment, agents of social change must out perform profit industries in terms of transparency and permission-seeking. We have to set the bar that retail will inevitably lower. 

If short term gains for STC and the greater sector are what matters than &quot;capturing&quot; phone numbers for which there wasn&#039;t a full disclosure opt-in mechanism seems like a great strategy, but where does this leave us in 5, 10, 15 years? Will people still respond to calls to action when they know they&#039;re essentially efforts to &quot;capture&quot; prospect contact info and for which they are practically guaranteed a solicitation call?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom &#8211; </p>
<p>While clearly a financially success, did Save the Children act responsibly in their innovative call-to-action campaign? In today&#8217;s marketing intensive environment, agents of social change must out perform profit industries in terms of transparency and permission-seeking. We have to set the bar that retail will inevitably lower. </p>
<p>If short term gains for STC and the greater sector are what matters than &#8220;capturing&#8221; phone numbers for which there wasn&#8217;t a full disclosure opt-in mechanism seems like a great strategy, but where does this leave us in 5, 10, 15 years? Will people still respond to calls to action when they know they&#8217;re essentially efforts to &#8220;capture&#8221; prospect contact info and for which they are practically guaranteed a solicitation call?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

