<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soup Shopping, With Emotion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.net/communications/soup-shopping-with-emotion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/soup-shopping-with-emotion/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=soup-shopping-with-emotion</link>
	<description>Fundraising and advocacy strategies. Trends, tips ... with an edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:21:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lord</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/soup-shopping-with-emotion/comment-page-1/#comment-20510</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 01:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1351#comment-20510</guid>
		<description>What a welcome post! I&#039;d like to affirm that using this kind of qualitative research is where breakthroughs are found. Here&#039;s a testimonial:

&quot;...it was the first time an organization had ever asked what was important to me. It influenced how I think about myself philanthropically and how we need to treat others.&quot;

-- Retired vice chair of the largest privately held company in the world ... just before he made a commitment of significance.

One key we&#039;ve seen in working the way you suggest -- anthropologist-like -- is how vital the assumptions embedded in the questions are. Positive questions get positive stories, as nearly 20 years of research using appreciative inquiry has shown.

(I&#039;ve been on a public search on LinkedIn to find groups and blogs like yours. Fresh, innovative thinking with a bias toward the possible, rather than the despairing. And a depth. So far, I&#039;ve also seen three comments, and my sense is that you attract just that kind of person.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a welcome post! I&#8217;d like to affirm that using this kind of qualitative research is where breakthroughs are found. Here&#8217;s a testimonial:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;it was the first time an organization had ever asked what was important to me. It influenced how I think about myself philanthropically and how we need to treat others.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; Retired vice chair of the largest privately held company in the world &#8230; just before he made a commitment of significance.</p>
<p>One key we&#8217;ve seen in working the way you suggest &#8212; anthropologist-like &#8212; is how vital the assumptions embedded in the questions are. Positive questions get positive stories, as nearly 20 years of research using appreciative inquiry has shown.</p>
<p>(I&#8217;ve been on a public search on LinkedIn to find groups and blogs like yours. Fresh, innovative thinking with a bias toward the possible, rather than the despairing. And a depth. So far, I&#8217;ve also seen three comments, and my sense is that you attract just that kind of person.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mazarine</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/soup-shopping-with-emotion/comment-page-1/#comment-20472</link>
		<dc:creator>Mazarine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1351#comment-20472</guid>
		<description>Would have been nice to see a picture of a campbells soup can that brought &quot;emotion&quot; to the table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would have been nice to see a picture of a campbells soup can that brought &#8220;emotion&#8221; to the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Zapp, copywriter</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/soup-shopping-with-emotion/comment-page-1/#comment-20450</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Zapp, copywriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1351#comment-20450</guid>
		<description>Tom

This is rock-solid guidance you&#039;re sharing.  Regarding the interviews I&#039;ll add that whoever conducts them ought to have experience doing interviews, and also strong people skills.  The answer people first give to a question seldom contains the heart of their story.  They&#039;re not deliberately being evasive.  It&#039;s just human nature to give &quot;surface&quot; answers.  The really good insights, feelings, and motivations are something a skilled interviewer needs to gently draw out.

Another thought is take the staff that answers the phone and give them quality sales and customer service training.  They can use every phone call to ask a couple key questions and flood the nonprofit’s database with valuable information.  In the long run it’s a very inexpensive research method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom</p>
<p>This is rock-solid guidance you&#8217;re sharing.  Regarding the interviews I&#8217;ll add that whoever conducts them ought to have experience doing interviews, and also strong people skills.  The answer people first give to a question seldom contains the heart of their story.  They&#8217;re not deliberately being evasive.  It&#8217;s just human nature to give &#8220;surface&#8221; answers.  The really good insights, feelings, and motivations are something a skilled interviewer needs to gently draw out.</p>
<p>Another thought is take the staff that answers the phone and give them quality sales and customer service training.  They can use every phone call to ask a couple key questions and flood the nonprofit’s database with valuable information.  In the long run it’s a very inexpensive research method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Oppenheim</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/soup-shopping-with-emotion/comment-page-1/#comment-20444</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Oppenheim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 19:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1351#comment-20444</guid>
		<description>Love this perspective. i think that the close connection and understanding we can get from our donors when communicating in this way is really crucial. People will respond better with this type of thoughtful understanding, and I think it would make many fundraisers even better at what they do. Great ideas!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love this perspective. i think that the close connection and understanding we can get from our donors when communicating in this way is really crucial. People will respond better with this type of thoughtful understanding, and I think it would make many fundraisers even better at what they do. Great ideas!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah Eustace</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/soup-shopping-with-emotion/comment-page-1/#comment-20436</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah Eustace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1351#comment-20436</guid>
		<description>Great post today. I&#039;m a big on encouraging npo&#039;s to interview not only donors, but also staff, program folks, people in the field, volunteers and  founders (that group of passionate people who had the vision in the first place). The stories you&#039;ll unearth may very well change your whole perspective and put new bounce in your step. Remember to ask open-ended questions, and, most importantly, to probe: &quot;How did that make you feel?&quot; &quot;Can you paint a picture of that for me?&quot; Not only will you discover incredible stories, but you&#039;ll also draw the interviewee closer to the cause by reminding them why they&#039;re involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post today. I&#8217;m a big on encouraging npo&#8217;s to interview not only donors, but also staff, program folks, people in the field, volunteers and  founders (that group of passionate people who had the vision in the first place). The stories you&#8217;ll unearth may very well change your whole perspective and put new bounce in your step. Remember to ask open-ended questions, and, most importantly, to probe: &#8220;How did that make you feel?&#8221; &#8220;Can you paint a picture of that for me?&#8221; Not only will you discover incredible stories, but you&#8217;ll also draw the interviewee closer to the cause by reminding them why they&#8217;re involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

