<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Instant Trust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.net/communications/instant-trust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/instant-trust/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=instant-trust</link>
	<description>Fundraising and advocacy strategies. Trends, tips ... with an edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:58:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/instant-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-29848</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1529#comment-29848</guid>
		<description>I read your post but not sure I can wholheartedly agree.

With email campaigns it&#039;s simply the nature of the beast. It&#039;s gonna be an uphill battle for you to get people to read your stuff if your email has a title of:

&quot;Maybe Someday You Could Get Somebody Interested Using This Technique....maybe&quot;

They might as well TRY to get your attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read your post but not sure I can wholheartedly agree.</p>
<p>With email campaigns it&#8217;s simply the nature of the beast. It&#8217;s gonna be an uphill battle for you to get people to read your stuff if your email has a title of:</p>
<p>&#8220;Maybe Someday You Could Get Somebody Interested Using This Technique&#8230;.maybe&#8221;</p>
<p>They might as well TRY to get your attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles H. Green</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/instant-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-29276</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles H. Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 03:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1529#comment-29276</guid>
		<description>Tom,

Your reaction is understandable, and anyone advertising trust work has to take it into account; it&#039;s probably a bad headline.  

But at the same time, if you think about it a bit, you&#039;d probably agree that a great deal of trust actually does take place &quot;in an instant.&quot;

We have this platitude that says &quot;trust takes a long time to build...and a moment to destroy.&quot;  In fact, that&#039;s more false than true.  My life&#039;s work is trust, and I&#039;ve written about this particular topic at:
http://trustedadvisor.com/trustmatters/844/Top-Trust-Myths-1-of-2-Trust-Takes-Time 

Certain aspects of trust do require time: any sense of reliability, for example, literally requires the passage of time.  But other aspects of trust--the more emotional assessments we make about others&#039; intentions, or their ability to empathize or relate to others--those judgments we make in a moment. 

As in most things trust-related, it depends on the context. 

(For what it&#039;s worth, I would also share your skepticism (which sounds like it was pretty instant, by the way) based on the headline.  But that doesn&#039;t mean the content is ridiculous; it&#039;s quite plausible).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>Your reaction is understandable, and anyone advertising trust work has to take it into account; it&#8217;s probably a bad headline.  </p>
<p>But at the same time, if you think about it a bit, you&#8217;d probably agree that a great deal of trust actually does take place &#8220;in an instant.&#8221;</p>
<p>We have this platitude that says &#8220;trust takes a long time to build&#8230;and a moment to destroy.&#8221;  In fact, that&#8217;s more false than true.  My life&#8217;s work is trust, and I&#8217;ve written about this particular topic at:<br />
<a href="http://trustedadvisor.com/trustmatters/844/Top-Trust-Myths-1-of-2-Trust-Takes-Time" rel="nofollow">http://trustedadvisor.com/trustmatters/844/Top-Trust-Myths-1-of-2-Trust-Takes-Time</a> </p>
<p>Certain aspects of trust do require time: any sense of reliability, for example, literally requires the passage of time.  But other aspects of trust&#8211;the more emotional assessments we make about others&#8217; intentions, or their ability to empathize or relate to others&#8211;those judgments we make in a moment. </p>
<p>As in most things trust-related, it depends on the context. </p>
<p>(For what it&#8217;s worth, I would also share your skepticism (which sounds like it was pretty instant, by the way) based on the headline.  But that doesn&#8217;t mean the content is ridiculous; it&#8217;s quite plausible).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Chernicoff</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/instant-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-29254</link>
		<dc:creator>David Chernicoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1529#comment-29254</guid>
		<description>Totally with you on your comments; quite a bit of the time when I’m online I look at something and can’t help asking myself questions about its credibility/etc.

Two things, though:

1) Not everybody does this (God knows); and

2) I can well imagine a set of tips that don’t build *active* trust—the kind a donor has for an organization for example—so much as a more passive kind of trust. Making sure your website looks professional, all the links work, pages are titled appropriate things, etc.—all the things that search engines look for to give a website a higher quality “score”—are chosen precisely because they allow a user to trust that what they’re looking at is authentic and doesn’t have any sinister ulterior motives. 

Maybe this isn’t “trust” so much as “lack of mistrust”—just because someone’s staying on your site doesn’t mean they’re ready to email you a routing number so you can go back to being prince of Nigeria. But clarity of presentation on the web does build implicit trust, and organizations ignore it at their peril.

Anyway, love the work ya’all do. Thanks for doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally with you on your comments; quite a bit of the time when I’m online I look at something and can’t help asking myself questions about its credibility/etc.</p>
<p>Two things, though:</p>
<p>1) Not everybody does this (God knows); and</p>
<p>2) I can well imagine a set of tips that don’t build *active* trust—the kind a donor has for an organization for example—so much as a more passive kind of trust. Making sure your website looks professional, all the links work, pages are titled appropriate things, etc.—all the things that search engines look for to give a website a higher quality “score”—are chosen precisely because they allow a user to trust that what they’re looking at is authentic and doesn’t have any sinister ulterior motives. </p>
<p>Maybe this isn’t “trust” so much as “lack of mistrust”—just because someone’s staying on your site doesn’t mean they’re ready to email you a routing number so you can go back to being prince of Nigeria. But clarity of presentation on the web does build implicit trust, and organizations ignore it at their peril.</p>
<p>Anyway, love the work ya’all do. Thanks for doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/instant-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-29226</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1529#comment-29226</guid>
		<description>Great Post!  I hope it will decrease the number of &#039;teaser&#039; subject lines or at least get people to think about what they are using to get people interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post!  I hope it will decrease the number of &#8216;teaser&#8217; subject lines or at least get people to think about what they are using to get people interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devon Kearney</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/instant-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-29207</link>
		<dc:creator>Devon Kearney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1529#comment-29207</guid>
		<description>Perhaps what they mean is &quot;4 secrets to not losing trust instantly online.&quot; If that&#039;s what they mean, then maaaybe I won&#039;t instantly mistrust them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps what they mean is &#8220;4 secrets to not losing trust instantly online.&#8221; If that&#8217;s what they mean, then maaaybe I won&#8217;t instantly mistrust them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Bete</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/instant-trust/comment-page-1/#comment-29199</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Bete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1529#comment-29199</guid>
		<description>One of the speakers works for a &quot;privacy seal&quot; service. I guess if I saw that a product or service was endorsed by a company I already trusted, I&#039;d have more trust in it. But I&#039;m not sure I need a Webinar for that. The best book I&#039;ve read on creating trust is &quot;Influence: Science and Practice&quot; by Robert B. Cialdini. You can see it here on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Influence-Practice-Robert-B-Cialdini/dp/0205609996/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpi_2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the speakers works for a &#8220;privacy seal&#8221; service. I guess if I saw that a product or service was endorsed by a company I already trusted, I&#8217;d have more trust in it. But I&#8217;m not sure I need a Webinar for that. The best book I&#8217;ve read on creating trust is &#8220;Influence: Science and Practice&#8221; by Robert B. Cialdini. You can see it here on Amazon: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Influence-Practice-Robert-B-Cialdini/dp/0205609996/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpi_2" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Influence-Practice-Robert-B-Cialdini/dp/0205609996/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpi_2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

