<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Excellent Direct Response Advice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theagitator.net/communications/excellent-direct-response-advice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/excellent-direct-response-advice/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=excellent-direct-response-advice</link>
	<description>Fundraising and advocacy strategies. Trends, tips ... with an edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:21:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Zapp, copywriter</title>
		<link>http://www.theagitator.net/communications/excellent-direct-response-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-19863</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Zapp, copywriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theagitator.net/?p=1346#comment-19863</guid>
		<description>You’re right Tom; this is good stuff.  And even if it is “old hat” it’s always beneficial to be reminded of the fundamentals.  In sports, for example, winning teams always work on the fundamentals season after season.

I could comment on any of the points above, but I’ll pick the last one.  For fundraising I interpret this as writing a donor-centered letter.  This seems to be particularly challenging for nonprofits to do for themselves (so immersed in the mission they struggle portraying an “outsider’s” perspective).  But writing about what the donor is accomplishing; how indispensable they are; how they saved Billy’s life; how they put a roof over Molly’s head; and so forth makes such a difference in the tone and warmth of a letter.  

It definitely stimulates response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’re right Tom; this is good stuff.  And even if it is “old hat” it’s always beneficial to be reminded of the fundamentals.  In sports, for example, winning teams always work on the fundamentals season after season.</p>
<p>I could comment on any of the points above, but I’ll pick the last one.  For fundraising I interpret this as writing a donor-centered letter.  This seems to be particularly challenging for nonprofits to do for themselves (so immersed in the mission they struggle portraying an “outsider’s” perspective).  But writing about what the donor is accomplishing; how indispensable they are; how they saved Billy’s life; how they put a roof over Molly’s head; and so forth makes such a difference in the tone and warmth of a letter.  </p>
<p>It definitely stimulates response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

